Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Sridevi

High Court Of Karnataka|22 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.A. NO.1607 OF 2015 (A) BETWEEN SMT. SRIDEVI, W/O. PRASHANTH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.66, VENKATESHA NILAYA, 3RD CROSS, LALBAUGH ROAD, BENGAURU-560027.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. B.J.KRISHNA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND SRI. GIRISH RAMANATHAN, RESIDING AT NO.59, FORT MAIN ROAD, SHEVAPET, SALEM-630002.
TAMILNADU, AND ALSO RESIDING AT “ISHAYA”
NO.4, 10TH ‘A’ MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS, NEAR WATER TANK PARALEL TO 100FT ROAD, INDIRANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560038.
ALSO RESIDNG AT SAMRUDDHI GRACE APARTMENT NO.35, 1A, 1ST FLOOR, VIVIANE ROAD, RICHARDS TOWN, BENGALURU-560005.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI. Y.S.H.REDDY, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(A) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT DATED 08.07.2015 PASSED BY THE XIII A.C.M.M., IN C.C.NO.34591/2011-ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I.ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT This appeal having been passed over in the Morning Session, when called in the Afternoon Session, neither the appellant nor his counsel present. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears the learned counsel for appellant has no interest to prosecute this case. Hence, the appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
KGR* Sd/-
JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Sridevi

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 November, 2019
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra