Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Yagneshwar And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|19 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2575 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
1. SRI.YAGNESHWAR, S/O PADMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT AGANI VILLAGE, HANUBALU HOBLI, SAKLESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT – 573 134.
2. SMT. SARALA, W/O YAGNESHWAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT AGANI VILLAGE, HANUBALU HOBLI, SAKLESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT – 573 134.
3. KUM.POORVIKA, D/O YAGNESHWAR, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT AGANI VILLAGE, HANUBALU HOBLI, SAKLESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT – 573 134.
4. SRI.NACHIKETH, S/O YAGNESHWAR, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT AGANI VILLAGE, HANUBALU HOBLI, SAKLESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT – 573 134.
…PETITIONERS (BY SHRI. PRAKASH M PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY POLICE INSEPCTOR, SAKALESHPURA POLICE STATION, SAKALESHPURA CIRCLE, HASSAN.
REPRESENTED BY S.P.P., HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. M/S. SENTINEL ADVENTURES, NO.1429, SEETHARAMANJANEYA TEMPLE ROAD, NORTHERN EXTENSION, HASSAN – 573 201.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.A.SATISH BABU, S/O LATE D.R.A.P.AMARENDRA.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL CASE NO.87 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPURA, FILED IN PURSUANCE OF THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN CR.NO.287/2017 IN SAKALESHPURA POLICE LODGE AGAINST THE PETITIONERS BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT ON THE BASIS OF THE COMPLAINT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 420, 465, 417, 436 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Shri Prakash M.Patil, learned advocate for the petitioners files a Memo of even date stating that this petition has become infructuous and accordingly prayed for its dismissal.
2. Memo is placed on record. The petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
3. In view of dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2018 does not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE GH
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Yagneshwar And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
19 July, 2019
Judges
  • P S Dinesh Kumar