Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Vishwa vs The State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|08 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7983 OF 2018 BETWEEN SRI. VISHWA S/O RAMU AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS R/O C. K. PALYA VILLAGE, SAKALAVARA POST, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562327. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI RUDRAPPA P, ADV.) AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY BANNERGHATTA POLICE STATION, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562327.
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALORE – 560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.P.YOGANNA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.438 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CRIME NO.154/2018 OF BANNERGHATTA POLICE STATION, BANGALORE DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 307 R/W 34 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.154/2018 of Bannerghatta Police Station. The said case is registered against the petitioner and accused No.1 and 3 for the offences punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of I.P.C., on the basis of the complaint of one Mani.
2. It is alleged that on 21.08.2018 at 8.00 p.m. when complainant and one Muruga were discussing about the repayment of loan amount to Muruga, accused No.1 assaulted him with size stone on his head and accused No.2 assaulted him with wooden log and attempted to commit his murder.
3. The injury suffered by the victim is simple in nature. As per C.D. records, he was treated as out- patient and sent home. The investigation is already completed. Under these circumstances, it is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail with suitable conditions. Therefore petition is allowed.
The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail in Crime No.154/2018 of Bannerghatta Police Station, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order;
2. He shall execute personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- and furnish two sureties in the like-sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Court for his appearance;
3. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer/Court as and when required for the purpose of investigation/ enquiry/trial;
4. He shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses by threats, inducement or otherwise.
Sd/- JUDGE HR CT-HR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Vishwa vs The State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
08 January, 2019
Judges
  • K S Mudagal