IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8661/2016 BETWEEN:
1. SRI. VIJAYA BHASKAR S/O SUNDARAM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, TMEIC INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS INDIA PVT LTD., KANIMINIKE VILLAGE KENGERI HOBALI, BENGALURU CITY - 560 060.
2. SRI SUBRAMANIYAN S/O RAMANATHAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, TMEIC INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS INDIA PVT LTD., KANIMINIKE VILLAGE KENGERI HOBALI, BENGALURU CITY - 560 060.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI GAGAN V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI DIWAKARA K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA KUMBALAGUDU POLICE RAMANAGARA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. KUM. KALAVATHI P. W/O PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, NUNNURU VILLAGE, NERALUR POST, CHENNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 571511 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, SPP-II FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CR.NO.377/2016 PENDING ON THE FILE OF II A.C.J.M., BENGALURU RURAL DIST., BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 354(A)(1)(iv) AND 509 OF IPC FOUND AT ANNEXURE-A ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The petitioners have sought to quash the FIR in Crime No.377/2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354(A)(1)(iv) and 509 of IPC, pending on the file of II A.C.J.M., Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned SPP-II for the respondent No.1 – State and perused the records.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned SPP-II for respondent No.1 submits that on completion of the investigation, ‘B’ report is submitted before the jurisdictional Court on 12.01.2017 and the same is accepted by the learned Magistrate on 02.11.2017.
4. In view of the above submission, the petition does not survive for consideration and hence, the petition is dismissed.
In view of the dismissal of the main petition, I.A.No.1/2016 does not survive for consideration and the same is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE nvj