Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Vijay Kumar vs Smt Kousalya Vijay W/O

High Court Of Karnataka|01 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8025/2017 BETWEEN:
SRI. VIJAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.126 3RD CROSS BHASHYAMNAGAR SAIBANANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 021.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED UMMER., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
SMT. KOUSALYA VIJAY W/O VIJAY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO 126, 3RD CROSS BHASHYAMNAGAR SAIBANANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 021.
... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ACQUITTAL OF THE RESPONDENT PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.460/2015 PASSED BY THE LXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU AND TO UPHELD THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE XIX ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU AND CONVICT AND SENTENCE THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R When the matter was called during pre-lunch session, learned Advocate appearing for petitioner was not present and matter was passed over.
2. When the matter is called at 4.50 p.m., there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Office objections have not been complied with though petition is filed on 23.09.2016. Even after imposing costs, none have appeared. This would only indicate that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE *sp
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Vijay Kumar vs Smt Kousalya Vijay W/O

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
01 April, 2019
Judges
  • Aravind Kumar