IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2018 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS SON OF KODANPPA, J. AGRAHARA VILLAGE, TAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. PAPI REDDY. G., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS SON OF KONDAPPA, RESIDENT OF MALLANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, TAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGALA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.04.2015 PASSED IN RA. NO. 108/2013, ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., ITINERATING AT MULBAGAL ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.04.2013 PASSED IN OS.NO. 207/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MULBAGAL.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 13.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr