Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Venkatesh And Others vs The State Of Karnataka Department Of And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|20 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NOS.55521-55528 OF 2018 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
1. SRI.VENKATESH S/O THIMMARAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YARS 2. SMT.SAKAMMA W/O THIMMAIAH K.V. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SRI.SIDDAPPA S/O BYRANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 4. SRI. APPAJI S/O BYRAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 5. SRI. LOKESH S/O MAYANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 6. SMT.BYRAMMA W/O LATE ANDANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 7. SRI.NAGARAJU S/O LATE NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 8. SRI.BYRAPPA S/O LATE BYRAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT MUDDAPURA – KARENAHALLI VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 571 511.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI.NAVEEN.J.N., AND SMT.GEETHARAJ, ADVOCATES) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SRECRETARY.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA – 571 511.
3. THE TAHSILDAR RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 571 511.
...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3 THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONDUCT PHODI AND DURASTI AND TO FIX BOUNDATIES IN RESPECT OF LANDS BEARING SY NO.73/2, 74/3, 74/4, 74/5, 74/6, 74/7, 74/8, 74/9, SITUATED AT MUDDAPURA KARENAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 27.01.2018 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-D, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, AND D6 AND ANNEXURE-E, E1 TO E7 AT DATED 7.12.2018 RESPECTIVELY TO THE W.Ps.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP , THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R In these matters, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents files a memo along with a communication dated 16.01.2019 received from 3rd respondent – Thasildar, Ramanagar wherein he would state that the Thasildar undertakes to consider the representation dated 17.12.2018 in accordance with law and complete the phodi work within six months.
By placing his submission on record, these Writ Petitions are disposed of.
It is also made clear that if phodi work is not completed on or before 16.07.2019, it is open for the petitioners to approach the contempt Court seeking appropriate action against the Tahasildar, Ramanagara, for non-compliance of undertaking given by him.
Sd/- JUDGE Prs*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Venkatesh And Others vs The State Of Karnataka Department Of And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
20 February, 2019
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana