Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sri V Venkatesh And Others vs Sri Rajendra Kumar And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|11 December, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION Nos.10140-10141/2015(GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SRI V. VENKATESH, S/O LATE M. VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, ASST.DIRECTOR(RETD), DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE, 2. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, W/O V. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 3. ARUNDATHI, D/O V. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 4. DIVYA KUMAR, S/O V. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT SADHUMATT ROAD, CHICKBALLAPUR-562101, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MVSRATHTABASSUM, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S. N. ASWATHANARAYAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI.RAJENDRA KUMAR, S/O RAJARAMA JETTY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 2. SMT. G. R. SUNANDA, D/O RAJARAMA JETTY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT SADHUMATT ROAD, CHICKBALLAPUR-562101.
3. THE CITY MUNICIPALITY CHICKBALLAPUR-562101. BY ITS COMMISSIONER ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI D. G. CHINNAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI VIJAY KRISHNA BHAT M., ADVOCATE FOR R3) …… THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.10.2014 PASSED IN M.A.NO.30/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC AT CHICKBALLAPUR ANNEXURE-G AND THE ORDER DATED 12.3.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.533/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JDUGE [JR.DN] AT CHICKBALLAPUR ANNEXURE-D.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Sri D.G.Chinnappa, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed memo stating that the above writ petitions are filed challenging the order dated 16.10.2014 made in M.A.No.30/2013 confirming the order dated 12.03.2013 made in O.S.No.533/2012. Now, the very suit in O.S.No.533/2012 came to be decreed on 13.12.2017 and therefore, the writ petitions have become infructuous.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Writ Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE kcm
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri V Venkatesh And Others vs Sri Rajendra Kumar And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 December, 2017
Judges
  • B Veerappa