Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri V Thimmanna vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|04 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P. NO.8256/2019 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
SRI.V.THIMMANNA S/O. LATE VENKATAPPA AGED 70 YEARS BUDIGERE VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562110 (BY SRI.JAGADEESHACHARI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THASILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, PIN-562110 3. THE CHAIRMAN REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION LAND GRANT COMMITTEE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER PIN-562110 (BY SRI.Y.D.HARSHA, AGA) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE R-2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION ANNX-A DTD. 6.11.2018 BY WAY OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Petitioner is seeking for a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 06.11.2018–Annexure-A whereunder petitioner has sought for regularization of his unauthorized cultivation in respect of land measuring 10 guntas in Sy.No.216 of Budigere Village, Channarayapatna Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, by submitting Form No.53 contending interalia that said application has not been considered though simultaneously other applications have been considered by third respondent- Committee.
2. Today, Sri.Y.D.Harsha, learned AGA appearing for respondents has filed a memo enclosing endorsement dated 05.12.2018, which would disclose that claim of petitioner has been rejected and has been intimated. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition and it stands dismissed. However, liberty is granted to petitioner to challenge the endorsement dated 05.12.2018, if so advised.
SD/- JUDGE DR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri V Thimmanna vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
04 November, 2019
Judges
  • Aravind Kumar