Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Uday Kumar And Others vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited A Company And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.33327/2019 (LA – KIADB) BETWEEN:
1. SRI UDAY KUMAR S/O Mr. DATTA GURUNATH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT No.2459-GH 16 ‘D’ MAIN ROAD, HAL II STAGE INDIRANAGAR 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560068.
2. SMT.PADMAVATHI.B.U W/O Mr. UDAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT No.2459-GH 16 ‘D’ MAIN ROAD, HAL II STAGE INDIRANAGAR 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560068. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI FREUD RICHARDSON, ADV. FOR SMT. JAYASREE NARASIMHAN, ADV.) AND:
1. BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR BMTC COMPLEX, K.H. ROAD SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR.
2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD No.14/3, 2ND FLOOR RASHTROTHANA PARISHAD BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD No.3, 1ST CROSS, KHENI BUILDING GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560001.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES VIDHAN SOUDHA, Dr. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI N.N.HARISH, ADV. FOR R-1;
SRI VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, ADV. FOR R-2 & R-3; SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA. FOR R-4.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 07.03.2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT No.2 AND THE NOTIFICATION DATED 28.06.2019 [ANNEXURE-B] ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT No.2 AND COMMUNICATION/ENDORSEMENT DATED 01.04.2019 [ANNEXURE-C] ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT No.1 TO THE PETITIONERS AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ACQUIRE THE ENTIRE BUILDING AS STIPULATED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 R/W KIADB ACT, 1966; AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Uday Kumar And Others vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited A Company And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 November, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha