IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR WRIT PETITION NO.31260/2017 (LB RES) BETWEEN 1. SRI THIPPESWAMY S/O. LATE. RANGANNA NAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT KAGGALADU VILLAGE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
2. SMT. THIMMAKKA W/O. RANGASWAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT KAGGALADU VILLAGE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI THYAGARAJU S/O. HALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT BHUTHAKATNAHALLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
4. SMT. LAKSHMAKKA W/O. YARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT BIDREKERE VILLAGE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
5. SRI MALLESH S/O. MARADIRANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT BIDREKERE VILLAGE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
6. SMT. BHAGYAMMA W/O. RAJSHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT BIDREKERE VILLAGE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
7. SRI PATHLINGAPPA, S/O. NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT KAGGALADU VILLAGE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
8. SRI. DODDARANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT BHUTHAKATNAHALLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
9. SRI. Y L RAJU S/O. LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT BHUTHAKATNAHALLI SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI VIJAYA CHANDRA NAYAKA T C, ADV. – ABSENT.) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DISTRICT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560001 2. REGIONAL COMMISSIONER 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, KH ROAD, SHANTHINAGARA, BANGALORE - 560027 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR.
4. TAHASILDAR SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
(BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR T.L, AGA.) ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 DTD:30.3.2015 AT ANNEXURE-K ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Case is called.
2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
3. This court vide order dated 18.01.2018 had granted two weeks time as a last opportunity to remove office objections. Despite passing of 1 ½ years nothing precious has been done making it apparent that the petitioners are disinterested in further prosecuting the petition.
Hence, petition stands dismissed for default.
Chs* CT-HR Sd/- JUDGE