IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NOs.20911/2012 & 22771/2012(LR) C/W W.P.NOs.9664/2012 & 11529-11530/2012(LR-SEC-48-A) IN W.P.NOs.20911/2012 & 22771/2012:
BETWEEN:
SRI. THIMMAPPA SON OF LATE GOVINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT 149, SREE VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, OPPOSITE TO IYD OFFICE ARSINAKUNTE, NELAMANGALA TALUK (SENIOR CITIZEN IS NOT CLAIMED) ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOPI, ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF SRI. P.M. SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE.
3. SRI. D.R. GANGADHAR RAO SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
4. SRI. D.R. HANUMANTHA RAO SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS.
5. SRI. D.R. KESHAVAMURTHY SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS.
6. SRI. D.R. RAMACHANDRA RAO SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
7. SRI. D.R. RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
8. SRI. D.R. NAGARAJ SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
9. SRI. D.R. MANJUNATH SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
10. SRI. D.R. ANAND SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.
NOs. 3 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT DASANAPURA VILLAGE DASANAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.C. BALARAJ, HCGP FOR R-1 & R-2; R-5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
SRI. B.K. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV., FOR R-7 TO R-9) THESE W.Ps. ARE FIELD UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 27 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:06.08.2011 PASSED IN CASE LRF(INA) NO.18/1975-76 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT-LAND TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AS PER ANNEXURE-F.
IN W.P.NOs.9664/2012 & 11529-11530/2012: BETWEEN:
SRI. CHIKKANNA SON OF LATE GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS REISIDING AT NAGANUR VILLAGE DASANAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK (SENIOR CITIZEN IS NOT CLAIMED) ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. GOPI, ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF SRI. P.M. SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE, REP. BY CHAIRMAN.
3. SRI. D.R. GANGADHAR RAO SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
4. SRI. D.R. HANUMANTHA RAO SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS.
5. SRI. D.R. KESHAVAMURTHY SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS.
6. SRI. D.R. RAMACHANDRA RAO SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
7. SRI. D.R. RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
8. SRI. D.R. NAGARAJ SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
9. SRI. D.R. MANJUNATH SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
10. SRI. D.R. ANAND SON OF LATE D. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.
NOs. 3 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT DASANAPURA VILLAGE DASANAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y.D. HARSHA, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2;
SRI. B.K. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV., FOR R-6 TO R-9) THESE W.Ps. ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 06.08.2011 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT LAND TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AS PER ANNEXURE-F.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw writ petitions on the ground that parties have settled the dispute. Said memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- JUDGE RU