IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1893 OF 2015 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI T.R.NAGESH S/O LATE RAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O TALAVARA KUNDUR VILLAGE KUNDUR POST, BANKAL HOBLI MUDIGERE TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 132 ...APPELLANT [(BY SRI V.N.JAGADEESH, ADV. (ABSENT)] AND:
1. SRI GANAPA S/O SRI RAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 2. SRI D.B.MANJUNATHA S/O SRI DYAVAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 3. SRI K.K.ANNAPPA S/O SRI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 4. SRI SURESH S/O SRI MOTAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 5. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O SRI SOMAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS ALL ARE R/O TALAVARA, KUNDUR VILLAGE KUNDUR POST, BANKAL HOBLI MUDIGERE TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 132 ….RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:12.02.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.76/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKMAGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.03.2010 IN OS NO.109/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MUDIGERE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T No representation for the appellant till 2.40 p.m. Records disclose that for last three consecutive hearing dates, there was no representation for the appellant. It appears, appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE KNM/-