IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.8840/2019 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
SRI SYED KHWAJA S/O LATE SHAHNAWAZ AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OCCUPATION NIL RESIDING AT #4699 OPP. NANDINI TUTORIAL NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. DILDAR SHIRALLI, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE DIVISION CONTROLLER, KSRTC, BENGALURU CENTRAL DIVISION DIVISION OFFICE, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560 027. ... RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 10.05.2018 AND DATED 27.03.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND E AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER In the instant petition, petitioner has sought for quashing of the endorsement at Annexure-‘E’ dated 27.03.2018 and Annexure-‘H’ dated 10.05.2018, by which petitioner’s grievance relating to compassionate appointment have been rejected on the ground that petitioner’s mother was working as Senior Division Engineer in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Government of India).
2. The object of providing compassionate appointment is to meet the immediate harness in the family. As it is evident from the record that petitioner’s family survived from 22.02.2009 till filing of writ petition. Merely petitioner’s mother got retired, petitioner has no right to seek for compassionate appointment after lapse of nearly 9 years. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE VMB