Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Sudharshan M vs The Union Of India And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.44912/2017 (KLR-RES-PIL) BETWEEN:
SRI SUDHARSHAN M S/O SRI RAMESH KOTIAN AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS KASTURI SHANTHI NIVAS SWARAJ MAIDAN (GROUND) MOODBIDRI-574 227 DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER (BY SRI ARUNA SHYAM M, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001 2. THE DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER KARNATAKA & GOA SUB-AREA CUBBON ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BENGALURU-560 009 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT MANGALURU-575 001 5. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES & SPORTS YUVANIKA NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 6. THE TAHASILDAR MOODBIDRI TALUK MOODBIDRI-574 227 7. THE CHIEF OFFICER TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MOODBIDRI TOWN MOODBIDRI-574 227 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R-7; R-3 & R-5 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 7.1.2010 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 THEREBY TRANSFERRING THE LAND MEASURING 28 ACRES 35 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.123/2A OF MARPADI VILLAGE, MOODBIDRI HOBLI, MANGALURU TALUK, IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT NO.5 AND ALSO THE ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.6 DATED 5.2.2010 REGARDING CHANGE OF MUTATION PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 AND ALSO SEEKING TO REMOVE THE ENCROACHMENTS AND REGISTER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT NO.1 WITH VACANT POSSESSION, WHICH ARE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURES-A, B & C RESPECTIVELY ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Ag.CJ (Oral):
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Ministry of Defence with regard to his grievance. Leave and liberty sought for is granted. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. In view of disposal of the writ petition, I.A.No.1/2017 does not survive for consideration; it stands disposed of accordingly.
Petition disposed of.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE bkv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Sudharshan M vs The Union Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 October, 2017
Judges
  • P S Dinesh Kumar
  • H G Ramesh