IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR R.F.A. No.938/2014 BETWEEN :
SRI SUBBARAMAN SURESH S/O V.SUBBARAMAN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO.TF-2, SHARAVANTHI PEARL, NO.131/1B, 9TH CROSS 19TH MAIN, MARENAHALLI J.P. NAGAR II PHASE BANGALORE-560078 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI RAHAMATHULLA SHARIFF, ADV. – ABSENT.) AND :
SRI D.KAMESH S/O V.DAKSHINAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO.8, VISHRANI BHAVAN TELANG ROAD, MATUNGA EAST MUMBAI-400019 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI MOHD. USMAN SHAIKH, ADV. FOR C/R.) THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.03.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.8263/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR POSSESSION.
THIS R.F.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
- 2 -
ORDER Appellant’s counsel is absent.
For the reason that the appellant’s counsel has failed to comply the office objections, appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- JUDGE AN/-