IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT APPEAL NOS.2644-2648 OF 2018 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
1. SRI SRINIVAS @ B.K. SHRINIVAS SON OF LATE KRISHNEGOWDA @ B.T. KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, BYRAPATTANA VILLAGE AND POST, MALLUR HOBLI, CHANNAPATTANA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT- 571 501.
2. SRI S. PRASANNA KUMAR SON OF L. SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1681, 1ST A CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, VISHWAPRIYANAGAR, BEGUR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 068.
3. SRI S.K. PRABHUDEV SON OF P. KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.41, SVG NAGARA, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MOODALAPALYA, BENGALURU-560 046.
(BY SRI K.K. VASANTH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT, ... APPELLANTS OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU-MYSURU ROAD, RAMANAGARAM-571 511.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARAM SUB-DIVISION, RAMANAGARAM-571 511.
3. THE THASILDAR CHANNAPATTANA TALUK, CHANNAPATTANA, RAMANGARA DISTRICT-571 501.
4. SMT. NINGAMMA WIFE OF S.K. THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, MALLUR HOBLI, CHENNAPATTANA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 501.
5. SMT. SHANTHAMMA WIFE OF LATE KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, MALLUR HOBLI, CHENNAPATTANA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 501.
6. SRI R. RAGHU SON OF LATE K. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, MALLUR HOBLI, CHENNAPATTANA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 501.
7. SMT. SUNITHA DAUGHTER OF LATE K. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, MALLUR HOBLI, CHENNAPATTANA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 501.
8. SMT. LATHA DAUGHTER OF LATE K. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, MALLUR HOBLI, CHENNAPATTANA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 501.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.L. KIRAN KUMAR, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3;
SRI B.S. MAHENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 TO R-8) THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.02.2018 IN WRIT PETITION NOS.21051-21055 OF 2017 (KLR-RR/SUR) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL.
***** THESE WRIT APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Heard learned counsels.
A memo is filed in the Court today seeking to withdraw these appeals. It is pleaded that the cost imposed may be recalled.
There are no objections by the respondent’s counsel for the same.
Hence, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
The order dated 23.02.2018, passed by the learned Single Judge imposing cost of Rs.30,000/- and consequential orders of recovery is set-aside. The writ appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE JJ/-