Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Siddivinayaka Temple Uppoor vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.52287 OF 2016 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN:
SRI SIDDIVINAYAKA TEMPLE UPPOOR VILLAGE, UPPOOR-576 105 UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI U PARAMESHWARA MADHYASTHA AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS.
(By Mr. SK ACHARYA, ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (I/C) HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, ‘B’ BLOCK, RAJATHADRI, MANIPAL-576 104 UDUPI DISTRICT.
(By Mr. V SHIVAREDDY HCGP FOR R1 & R2) - - -
… PETITIONER … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD.19.7.2016 ON THE FILE OF THE R-2 VIDE ANNEX-C AND TO DECALRE THE SAID NOTIFICATION AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ILLEGAL AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo stating that the petition has been rendered infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE SS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Siddivinayaka Temple Uppoor vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe