Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Siddaramegowda And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner 2 And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|30 May, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NOS.8723 TO 8726 OF 2012(KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
1. SRI SIDDARAMEGOWDA S/O GAVI SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS 2. SRI ANDANIGOWDA S/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 3. SRI JOGIGOWDA S/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 4. SRI GANGADHAR S/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENT OF DODDAGARUDANAHALLI, BASARALU HOBLI, TALUK AND DISTRICT:MANDYA.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI CHANDRAKANTH R.GOULAY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA DIVISION, MANDYA.
3. THE TAHSILDAR MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA.
4. SRI RAMALINGEGOWDA S/O KULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 5. SRI SIDDEGOWDA S/O KULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 6. SRI ANAND S/O KULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 7. SRI CHIKKAPUTTEGOWDA S/O KULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 8. SRI BYREGOWDA S/O KULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENT OF DODDAGARUDANAHALLI, BASARALU HOBLI, TALUK AND DISTRICT:MANDYA. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.S.MAHANTHESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 SRI B.J.SOMAYAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R8) ***** THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RELEVANT RECORDS AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN R.P.NO.43 OF 2009 DATED 13.12.2010 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-E, AND THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 5.9.2011 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-F, AS ILLEGAL AND VOID ETC., THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of the Court to withdraw these petitions with liberty to file documents including the death certificate of one Smt.Sukanya before the Deputy Commissioner. If such documents are filed the Deputy Commissioner to consider the same in a manner known to law.
Petitions are disposed off accordingly.
SD/- JUDGE Rsk/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Siddaramegowda And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner 2 And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2017
Judges
  • Ravi Malimath