Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Siddalingappa vs Smt Rajamma

High Court Of Karnataka|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No.1312 of 2017 (INJ) Between:
SRI SIDDALINGAPPA SON OF YEDIURAPPA, AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NANDHIHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMKUR RURAL TALUK, EARLIER KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR ... APPELLANT (BY SRI B.N.SHIVANNA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) And:
SMT. RAJAMMA WIFE OF HUCHE GOWDA, AGED 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NANDHIHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMKUR RURAL TALUK, EARLIER KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 03.11.2005 PASSED IN R.A.NO.208/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT TUMKUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED : 23.03.1999 PASSED IN O.S.No.575/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN.) AND JMFC., AT TUMKUR.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 11.10.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
KPS Sd/- Judge
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Siddalingappa vs Smt Rajamma

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad