IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2514 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
1. SRI SHIVANNA SON OF LATE BASAVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS.
2. SRI. SOMASHEKARAPPA SON OF LATE MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/AT SEEHALLI GRAMA, BANNUR HOBLI, T.NARASIPURA TALUK - 570 001. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. NARENDRA D. V GOWDA., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1 . SRI S. NATARAJ SON OF CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS.
2. SRI. HEMARAJU SON OF S. NATARAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/AT SEEHALLI GRAMA, BANNUR HOBLI, T.NARASIPURA TALUK – 570 001. .. RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.01.2017 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 31/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, T. NARASIPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.07.2013 PASSED IN OS. NO. 62/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., T. NARASIPURA.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellants. This Court on 06.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
nv Ct:sr SD/- JUDGE