IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.52104 OF 2018 (MV) BETWEEN:
SRI SADANAND CHATHRA S/O SRI GOVIND CHATHRA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NANA SAHEB ROAD, VADERAHOBLI, KUNDAPUR, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI AJITH A. SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE UNION OF INDIA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI.
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANASOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS DISIGNATED AUTHORITY, THE HON’BLE MINISTER FOR CO-OPERATION, NO.318, 3RD FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
4. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.
5. BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.
6. NORTH EAST KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICE, GROUND FLOOR, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
7. NORTH EAST KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICE, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI-580 030. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SANDESH CHOUTA, ASG FOR R-1 & SRI G.A. SRIKANTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI M. MUNIGANGAPPA, HCGP FOR R-2;
SRI HAREESH T. BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-4; SRI SIDDANANJAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-5;
SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-6; SMT. S. NIRMALA, ADVOCATE FOR R-7;
R-3 SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE AND SRIKE DOWN SECTIONS 99 AND 100 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT OF 1989 (CENTRAL ACT NO.59 OF 1988) AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, VOID, UNENFORCEABLE AND VIOLATIVE OF PART III OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IN PARTICULAR, ARTICLES 14, 19(1)(g) IF 21 AND VIOLATIVE OF PART XIII OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 301 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 30.07.2019 for withdraw the petition. Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE HA/-