IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.673/2009 (PAR) BETWEEN:
BUKKAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS 1. SRI GANESHA S/O LATE BUKKAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS (a.i). SMT.PUSHPAMMA WIFE AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS (a.ii). SRI G.MUNIRAJU SON AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS (a.iii). SRI RAGHU SON AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS (a.iv). SMT.MAHADEVAMMA DAUGHTER W/O SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS (a.i) TO (a.iv) ARE R/AT NAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL WHITE FIELD POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 2. SRI ANJANAPPA S/O LATE BUKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SRI MANJUNATH S/O LATE BUKKAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS 3(a). MUNILAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 3(b). MADHU S/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 3(c). MEGHA D/O LATE MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER MUNILAKSHMAMMA 4. SMT.RATHNAMMA D/O LATE BUKKAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
4(a). SMT.AMMAYAMMA @ MUNILAKSHMAMMA W/O MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS A2 TO A4(a) ARE R/AT NAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK – 560 056 5. SMT.KUMARI D/O LATE BUKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT B.NARAYANAPPA VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK – 560 016 … APPELLANTS (BY SRI R.SATHISH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI S.RAMAIAH S/O LATE SONNAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS (a). SMT.LAKSHMAMMA WIFE AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS (b). SRI SHANTHA KUMAR SON AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS (c). SRI MUNISWAMY GOWDA SON AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS (d). RAJANNA SON AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS (e). SRI RAVICHANDRA SON AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS (f). SMT.VIJAYALAKSHMI DAUGHTER AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS (g). SMT.RENUKAMMA DAUGHTER AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS (h). SMT.PUSHPA DAUGHTER AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R1(a) TO R1(h) ARE R/AT CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 2. SMT.MUNIYAMMA S/O LATE MALLANNA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 3. SRI NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE MALLANNA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 4. SRI MUNISWAMY S/O LATE MALLANNA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R2 TO R4 ARE R/AT NAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK – 560 066 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
R2 AND R4 ARE SERVED; SERVICE OF NOTICE IN RESPECT OF R1(a) TO R1(h) HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER DATED 4.12.2014) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2008 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE IN R.A.NO.101/2007 DISPOSING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.07.2007 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE IN OS.NO.421/2002.
THIS RSA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Learned Counsel for the appellants files memo for withdrawal of the appeal. Recording the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending IAs stood disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE KSR