IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT C.R.P. No.157/2017 BETWEEN:
SRI. S.R. ANNAIAH REDDY S/O LATE RAMASWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO.85/2, 2ND MAIN 5TH CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR MADIVALA BENGALURU-560068.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. N R NAIK, ADV. -ABSENT) AND:
1. SRI. CHIKKARAMAIAH REDDY S/O YALLAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/A NO.40, 1ST MAIN MANJUNATHA LAYOUT HSR 7TH SECTOR BENGALURU—560068.
2. SRI M C MUKUNDA S/O CHIKKARAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS NO.10/10, 3RD CROSS CHIKKA ADUGODI BENGALURU-560029.
3. SRI C RAMESH S/O CHIKKARAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS H S R LAYOUT BENGALURU.
4. SRI C BABUREDDY S/O CHIKKARAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO.74, IST AVENUE TEACHERS COLONY KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560034.
5. SMT.C ANURADHA W/O LATE MARUTHI D/O CHIKKARAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/A NO.40, 1ST MAIN MANJUNATHA LAYOUT HSR 7TH SECTOR BENGALURU-560068.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V RANGA RAMU, ADV. FOR R1 TO R5) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.03.2017 PASSED ON IA NO.8 IN OS NO.7060/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE 29TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-30) DISMISSING THE IA.NO.8 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(D).
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER This revision petition is directed against the order dated 17.03.2017 passed on I.A.No.8 in O.S.No.7060/2012 by which, the application filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC is rejected.
2. No representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the revision petition would not survive for consideration in view of the fact that the suit in O.S.No.7060/2012 from which, this revision petition arises has been disposed of.
3. On verification through the High Court Website, it is found that O.S.No.7060/2012 on the file of 29th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore is disposed of on 29.03.2017.
4. In view of disposal of the main suit itself, the present revision petition would not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE mpk/-* CT:bms