IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.53057/2017 (LB-BMP-PIL) BETWEEN:
1. SRI S.PRASAD S/O SHIVASHANKAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.45, UDGAMA NILAYA 7TH A MAIN, 3RD CROSS SRINIDHI LAYOUT, KONANAKUNTE BANGALORE SOUTH BANGALORE-560 062 2. SRI M.SUDHAKAR S/O M.MANNIKAM AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.1189, 3RD CROSS 2ND MAIN, BEHIND VITTALA HOSPITAL HOSAKEREHALLI BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BANGALORE SOUTH BANGALORE-560 085 3. SRI SRIDHAR B.V S/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.554, 6TH MAIN 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE-560 010 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI P.DHANANJAYA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIVEK HOLLA, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI V.SREENIDHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE VARIOUS REPRESENTATIONS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC INCLUDING THE OBJECTION AT ANNEX-A TO D RESPECTIVELY AS PROVIDED UNDER LAW.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING-‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Ag.CJ (Oral):
1. Heard. Sri V.Sreenidhi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) submits that respondent No.2 will consider the representations of the petitioners, copies of which are produced as Annexures - A and B within four weeks from today. The learned Counsel further submits that the BBMP will not put up any construction in the passages in the City Market and if there are any illegal constructions, the BBMP will take appropriate steps to get them removed expeditiously. The aforesaid submissions are placed on record.
2. In view of the above, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that no further order is necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Petition disposed of.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE Yn.