IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO. 44786 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI S.P.RAJU, SON OF G.PUTTASWAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.120, KADAMBA NILAYA, 1ST CROSS, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, T.DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU – 560 057.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI JEEVAN KUMAR.B.S., ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI M.NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF SRI B.MUNIYAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.1020/B, WARD NO.5, T.DASARAHALLI, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 057.
... RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.09.2017 IN O.S.NO.6257 OF 2017 VIDE ANNEXURE – C PASSED BY THE LEARNED 55TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Petitioner filed a suit for injunction wherein an application was filed seeking for temporary injunction. The Trial Court ordered emergent notice on the said application and suit summons to the defendants. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition is filed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that no reasons are assigned while passing the impugned order. Hence, interference is called for.
3. On hearing the learned counsel, I do not find any error in the order of the Trial Court, which calls for interference by this Court. The Trial Court has ordered notice on I.A.No.1. Necessarily, the same would be considered after appearance of the parties. Hence, I find that no grounds are made out to call for interference by this Court.
Petition being devoid of merits is dismissed.
SD/- JUDGE dh