IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A.No.4431 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN Sri. Rupen Patel S/o PA Patel Aged about 47 years Residing at 6-3-635, 4th Floor Akashaganga, Khairatabad Hyderabad represented by GPA Holder Sri.Prakash Babu S/o Gurunatha Rao Aged about 57 years Residing at No.3-6-739, Himayath Nagar Hyderabad … Appellant (By Sri.D.R.Ravishankar, Adv., - Absent) AND 1. Smt. Saraswathi W/o Srinivas Aged about 59 years Residing at No.140, 24th Main Srinivas Nagar, Nandini Layout Bangalore-560 096 2. Smt. Prabhavathi W/o Narayanaswamy Aged about 54 years Residing at No.61, 21st Main, J.C.Nagar, Kurubarahalli Bangalore-560 086 3. Sri.Krishnappa S/o Late Muniramaiah Since dead represented by Legal Representatives- Respondents No.4 to 7 4. Srinivasa S/o Late Krishnappa Aged about 69 years 5. Venkatachala S/o Late Krishnappa Aged about 67 years 6. Dhananjay S/o Late Krishnappa Aged about 65 years 7. Siddaramaiah S/o Late Krishnappa Aged about 59 years Respondents No.4 to 7 are residing at Belthur Village, Kadugodi Village Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk 8. Smt.Lakshmamma W/o Kondappa Aged about 65 years Residing at Kadugodi Village Bidarahalli Hobli Bangalore East Taluk 9. Narayanappa S/o Late Yellappa Aged about 65 years Residing at Kadugodi Village Bidarahalli Hobli Bangalore East Taluk 10. Smt. Lakshmamma W/o Manju Aged about 57 years Residing at Kadugodi Village Bidarahalli Hobli Bangalore East Taluk … Respondents This MFA is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(D) of CPC against the order dated:12.04.2017 passed in Misc.No.20/2015 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru dismissing the petition filed under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC.
This Appeal coming on for Orders this day, the Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent.
2. As per the order dated 11.10.2018, one week time was finally granted to comply the office objections, failing which, this appeal shall be dismissed on the next date of hearing.
3. Even today, learned counsel for the appellant has not appeared and no steps were taken for compliance of office objections. Hence, in view of the order dated 11.10.2018, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE cp*