Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Ravikumar vs State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|14 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 5519/2018 BETWEEN SRI. RAVIKUMAR AGED 29 YEARS S/O. LATE GOVINDAIAH C/O. ANKA REDDY NO. 32, 16TH CROSS KAGGADASAPURA C.V. RAMAN NAGAR POST BENGALURU – 560 093 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.L. JAYARAMU., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NELAMANGALA (T) P.S BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ROHITH B J., HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENALARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.352/2016 REGISTERED BY NELAMANGALA TOWN POLICE STATION, BENGALURU DISTRICT AND IN SPL.C.NO.80/2017 PENDING BEFORE THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss. 366(A), 344, 376 AND 506 OF IPC AND SECTION 6 OF POCSO ACT AND SECTION 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The matter having been passed over in the Morning Session, when called in the Afternoon Session, neither the petitioner nor his counsel present before the court.
The order sheet discloses that, four opportunities have been granted to comply with the office objections. But, so far the office objections have not been complied with. This indicates that, the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE KGR*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Ravikumar vs State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
14 October, 2019
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra