IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1569 OF 2015 Between:
Sri Ramayya Rai, S/o.Sankappa Rai, Aged about 73 years, R/o.Hallimane House, Katruppady Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K. District – 574 201.
... Appellant (By Sri. Vishwajith Shetty S., Advocate) And:
Jathappa Rai (Since dead) His Legal representatives 1. Smt.Rathna, W/o.late Jathappa Rai, Aged about 60 years, R/o.Hallimane House, Katruppady Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K. District – 574 201.
2. Kusuma, D/o. late Jathappa Rai, Aged about 42 years, R/o.Hallimane House, Katruppady Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K. District – 574 201.
3. Saraswathi, D/o. late Jathappa Rai, Aged about 39 years, R/o. Hallimane House, Katruppady Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K. District – 574 201.
4. Harish Rai, S/o. late Jathappa Rai, Aged about 39 years, R/o. Hallimane House, Katruppady Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K. District – 574 201.
5. Prema, D/o. late Jathappa Rai, Aged about 37 years, R/o. Hallimane House, Katruppady Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K. District – 574 201.
6. Indraksha Rai, S/o. late Jathappa Rai, Aged about 35 years, R/o. Hallimane House, Katruppady Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K. District – 574 201.
7. Vanitha, D/o. late Jathappa Rai, Aged about 30 years, R/o. Hallimane House, Katruppady Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K. District – 574 201.
... Respondents This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.07.2015 in R.A.No.48/2012, on the file of the V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangalore, sitting at Puttur, D.K., dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2011 in O.S.No.111/2001 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, D.K.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Admission this day, the Court delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 24.03.2019 stating that the matter has been amicably settled out of the Court.
In view of the memo filed, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
SD/- JUDGE PN/-