IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 483 OF 2017 Between:
1. SRI RAMARAO SON OF VENKOBRAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS.
2. SRI CHANDRASHEKARARAO AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS SON OF RAMARAO 3. SRI PRABHAKARARAO AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS SON OF RAMARAO.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT DESHIHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI BANGARPET TALUK.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR L., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
1. SRI NAGAMUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS SON OF SIDDALINGAPPA DESIHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI BANGARPET TALUK.
2. SRI DODDANARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS SON OF LATE HUCHAPPA.
3. SMT SHANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS WIFE OF DODDANARAYANAPPA.
4. SRI MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS SON OF DODDANARAYANAPPA.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.08.2016 PASSED IN RA NO. 51/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND PRL. JMFC., KGF ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.05.2014 PASSED IN OS NO. 129/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANGARPET.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellants. This Court on 31.07.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr