IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.33261 OF 2019 & WRIT PETITION NOS.39297-39306 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. RAMANJINAPPA S/O LATE HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. SMT. AKKAYYAMMA W/O LATE OBAYYA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 3. SRI. B.S. MUNIYAPPA S/O CHINNASWAMY @ CHINNASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 4. SRI. GULLAPPA S/O CHINNASWAMY @ CHINNASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 5. SRI. KRISHNAPPA S/O APPAJIRANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS 6. SRI. NANJAPPA S/O APPAJIRANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 7. SMT. ANNAMMA W/O DODDAPATALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 8. SRI. C. MUNIGOWDA S/O CHIKKAPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 9. SRI. MUTHARAJU S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 10. MISS. PRAMEELA D/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 11. SRI. GOPALASWAMY S/O MADURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT BETTANAHALLI GRAMA, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
REP. BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SRI. B.H.NAGARAJ S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT BETTANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
… PETITIONERS (BY SRI.H.R.ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION NEW DELHI - 110 001.
2. THE MEMBER SECRETARY BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BIAAPA) NO.333/1, V.J.COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, SULIBELE ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, DEVANAHALLI - 562 110 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
(BY SRI.M.N.KUMAR, CGC) …RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITONERS DTD.28.12.2018 VIDE ANNX-D.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.H.R.Anantha Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Sri.M.N.Kumar, learned Central Government Counsel for respondents.
The petitions are admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same are heard finally.
2. In these petitions, the petitioners inter alia seek for a direction to respondents authority to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners dated 28.12.2018 vide Annexure-D.
3. When the matters were taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petitions be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 28.12.2018 submitted by petitioners in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondents submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioners shall be dealt with in accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation submitted by petitioners, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-