IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.9481/2015(GM-CPC) BETWEEN 1. SRI RAMAKRISHNA N.N, S/O LATE V. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/AT NO.59, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 7TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 095 2. SMT. PRAMEELA W/O SRI. RAMAKRISHNA N.N. AGED ABOUT 59 EYARS R/AT NO.59, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 7TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 095 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI V B SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND 1. SRI ROOPESH M H S/O SRI HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS NO.682, 8TH B MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 079 2. SMT. SHARMILA M.
W/O M. SIVAKUMAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.1241, HAL 3RD CROSS, 3RD STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA BANGALORE-560 008 3. SRI. Y.R. MADHU S/O SRI. MADHAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS FLAT NO.G-1, BALAJI ABODE 2ND MAIN, VIBHUTHIPURA, BASAVANAGARA BANGALORE-560 071 4. SRI. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNINANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS S.NO.7,8, NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE, SRINIVAGILU, EJIPURA, VIVEK NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 047 5. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, CORPORATION CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 002 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K V MOHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5 R4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11.4.2014 IN O.S.NO.1002/12 ALLOWING THE APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 6, RULE 17 OF CPC PASSED BY THE IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Plaintiffs in O.S.No.1002/2012 on the file of IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, have come up in this writ petition impugning the order dated 11.4.2014 passed on an application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC.
2. When this matter is taken up for consideration this day, the stage of the original proceedings in O.S.No.1002/2012 is looked into in the e-courts website of Bengaluru District. On going through the same, it is seen that O.S.No.1002/2012 has already been disposed of by judgment dated 17.09.2018. Therefore, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition as the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE nd/-