IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.5596 OF 2018 (GM-ST/RN) BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMAKRISHNA A S/O ANJANEYACHAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT. No.33, OPP. TO SRI RAMA TEMPLE BYATARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560092.
(BY MR. H.R. ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIKASA SOUDHA DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE SUB-REGISTRAR HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560022.
… PETITIONER (BY MR. V. SHIVAREDDY, HCGP FOR R1 & R2) - - -
… RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO DELIVER THE ORIGINAL SALE DEED DATED 17.6.2016 VIDE ANNEX-A AFTER DULY REGISTERING THE SAME & ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to directing respondent No.2 to deliver the original sale deed dated 07.06.2010 contained in Annexure-A after duly registering the same.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the he be granted with a liberty to make a fresh representation before the competent authority. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent submitted that if such a representation is made by the petitioner the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law.
3. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner that in case a representation is made with regard to his grievance raised in the petition to the competent authority, the same shall be decided by the competent authority within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such a representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS