Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Ramadasaiah And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|20 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.P.Nos.21587-21588/2019 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAMADASAIAH S/O. LATE KUMATAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS MACHANAHALLI, BILLANAKOTE SOMAPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562111 2. SRI NARAYANAPPA S/O. LATE. KUMATAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS MACHANAHALLI SOMAPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562111 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI MOHAN R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT MS BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560001 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ARAVIND BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD OPP. RBI, BENGALURU 560001 3. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ARAVIND BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD OPP. RBI, BENGALURU 560001 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OFFICE - II, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 49 KHANIJABHAVAN EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR BENGALURU 560001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;
SRI P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONS U/S 3(1) OF KIADB ACT, 1966 ISSUED BY THE R1 DATED 29.12.2012 PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEXURE – A AND U/S 28(4) OF KIADB ACT, 1966, AND NOTIFICATION DATED 31.08.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE – B AND IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER’S LAND IS CONCERNED AS ILLEGAL ERRONEOUS ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD RESULTING IN MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND ETC., THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petitions.
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
The writ petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE KTY
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Ramadasaiah And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
20 November, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha