IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NOS.34785-787/2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAMACHANDREGOWDA S/O LATE HANUMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
2. H K RANGASWAMY S/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/ AT HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 3. SHANKARAPPA S/O KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/ AT HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 4. VENKATESH S/O LATE H K KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI HOLENARSIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT .
5. SMT. MANJULA W/O LATE BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 6. SRI DARSHAN S/O LATE BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT MANJULA RESIDING AT HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 7. SUMA D/O LATE BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT MANJULA RESIDING AT HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT (BY SRI.S V ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. SHARADAMMA D/O LATE PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE R/ AT HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI ... PETITIONERS HOLENARSIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT.
2. MANULA D/O PUTTAMMA AGEDA BOUT 60 YEARS R/ AT HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS STRIKING DOWN THE ISSUE OF THE PROCESS IN RESPECT OF THE ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS NO.1, 15 & 27 IN O.S.NO.53 & 54/2000 ON THE FILE CJ & JMFC HOLENARASIPURA BEING EXECUTED EX NO.19 & 20/2012 ON THE FILE CJ & JMFC HOLENARASIPURA WHO HAVE DIED DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE SUIT IN THE TRAIL COURT AND BE PLEASED TO DECLARE THAT IN THE ABSENCE OF THEIR L.RS. NOT BEING NOT BROUGHT ON RECORD, THE SUIT FILED AS AGAINST THE PRESENT PETITIONERS WHO ARE LR'S OF THOSE DEFENDENTS IS WHOLLY UNENFORCEABLE IN LAW AND QUASH THE SAME AS UN-CONSTITUTIONAL, ULTRA-VIRES AND OPPOSED TO ALL THE CANNONS AND PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petitions.
Said memo is placed on record. In view of the same, writ petitions stands dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- JUDGE DR