IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION NOS.47930 OF 2017 & 51392 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN Sri. Rajesh Kumar Lalwani .G Aged about 48 years, S/o Sri. Ghevarchand Lalwani, Residing at No.205/A, 1st Floor, 55th Cross, 4th Block, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru – 560 010. … Petitioner (By Sri. V.B. Shivakumar, Advocate) AND 1. M/s. Marvel Tools and Accessories Pvt. Ltd., Accessories Pvt. Ltd., A Private Limited Company, Incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, Having its Registered Office at: No.103/1, 2nd Block, 2nd Main, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru – 560 010. Represented by Smt. Neelam M. Patwari 2. Smt. Neelam M. Patwari Aged about 44 years, W/o Sri. Mahendra Patwari @ Mahendra Kumar .S, Director, M/s. Marvel Tools and Accessories Pvt. Ltd., No.103/1, 2nd Block, 2nd Main, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru – 560 010. Also at:
“Aditya”, No.172, 2nd Stage, 5th Cross, Bhovi Colony, 3rd Phase, Near Chowdeshwari Temple, BESCOM Road, Opp. Side of Mount Carmel School, Basaveshwaranagar, Bengaluru – 560 079.
3. Sri. Dhruv M. Patwari Aged about 19 years, S/o Sri. Mahendra Patwari @ Mahendra Kumar .S, Director, No.103/1, 2nd Block, 2nd Main, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru – 560 010. Also at:
No.16/2, 01, Satya Sai Nilaya, 17th “A” Cross, 8th Main, Malleshwaram, Bengaluru – 560 055.
4. M/s. Bajaj Finance Ltd., A Company registered under the Provisions of Indian Companies Act, Having its Corporate Office At 4th Floor, Survey No.208/1B, Behind Weikefield II Park, Vimananagar, Pune – 411 014.
Represented by its Manager. … Respondents These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the orders dated 05.09.2017 passed by the LX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, in O.S. No.3816/2016 vide Annexure-A.
These writ petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the court made the following:
ORDER After arguing the matter for sometime, Sri. V.B. Shivakumar, learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
The memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE MBM