IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 1095 OF 2018 (PAR) Between:
SRI. RAJANNA SON OF HENJANNA AGE 50 YEARS RESIDENT OF GAJAMARANAHLLI THOTADAMANE, KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI.RANGANATHAPPA. K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
SMT. HENJAMMA WIFE OF LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS RESIDENT OF GIRIGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDERI HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.03.2018 PASSED IN RA. NO. 19.2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIRA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.03.2017 PASSED IN OS. NO. 69/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIRA.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 17.10.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr