Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Rajakumar M G vs The State Of Karnataka Department Of Commerce And Industries M S Building And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|28 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.22470/2019 (LA – RES) BETWEEN:
SRI RAJAKUMAR.M.G., S/O GANGAIAH.M.G., AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS MACHANAHALLI VILLAGE BILLANAKOTE POST NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562111 AND ALSO AT No.54, 7TH MAIN, PAL CHINNAPPA LAYOUT SUBRAMANYAPURA, BIKASIPURA BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU-560061. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHREERAM NAYAK., ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001.
2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ARAVIND BHAVAN, OPP. RBI NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560001.
3. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ARAVIND BHAVAN, OPP. RBI NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560001.
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OFFICE-II, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD No.49, KHANIJABHAVAN EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR RACECOURSE ROAD BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.B.PATIL, ADV. FOR C/R4; SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA. FOR R-1.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION U/S 3[1] OF KIADB ACT, 1966, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT No.1 DATED 29.12.2012 PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AND U/S 28[4] OF KIADB ACT, 1966, AND NOTIFICATION DATED 31.08.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER’S LAND IS CONCERNED AS ILLEGAL ERRONEOUS ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD RESULTING IN MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE; AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Rajakumar M G vs The State Of Karnataka Department Of Commerce And Industries M S Building And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha