Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt Mantralaya vs Sri Hanumanthappa And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|28 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B. V. NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NO.44870 OF 2017 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
SRI RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY MUTT MANTRALAYA 518345, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI H. P. VEDAVYASACHAR, S/O. LATE PRANASHECHAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT B91, SAMNEERAPURA, M.G.K. MURTHY LAYOUT, 6TH MAIN, CHAMRAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJESWARA P. N., ADV.) AND:
1. SRI HANUMANTHAPPA S/O. NARASAPPA, MAJOR.
2. SRI MUTHAPPA S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA, MAJOR.
3. SRI MALLIKARJUN S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA, MAJOR.
4. SRI SURESH S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA, MAJOR.
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT GABBUR VILLAGE, TQ. DEODURG, RAICHUR – 584 101.
5. SRI RAMANNA S/O. SHARNAPPA BAGALI, MAJOR.
6. SRI BASAVARAJ S/O. SHARNAPPA BAGALI, MAJOR.
7. SRI HANUMANTHA S/O. SOMANNA, MAJOR.
8. GURUBASAMMA D/O. RAMANNA, MAJOR.
RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT GANEKAL VILLAGE, TQ. DEODURG, RAICHUR-584 101.
9. THE TAHSILDAR DEODURG, TQ.DEODURG, RAICHUR-584 101.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G. RAMESH NAIK, H.C.G.P. FOR R-10) * * * THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 24-4-2017 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.9 - TAHSILDAR [ANNEXURE-A] AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The petitioner has assailed the order dated 24-4-2017 passed by the Tahsildar.
2. As against that order, the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy. In the circumstances, the writ petition is not entertained reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative statutory remedy, if so advised. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
The Office to return the certified copies of the impugned order to the learned counsel forthwith, subject to filing of copies of the same for the purpose of record.
Sd/- JUDGE kvk
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt Mantralaya vs Sri Hanumanthappa And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
28 September, 2017
Judges
  • B V Nagarathna