IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.352 OF 2015 (EX) BETWEEN:
SAMPATH, G.R, S/O LATE G.R.RAMASWAMY IYENGER, OVEN FRESH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, NO.237-240, B.R.COMPLEX, 13TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU – 38, (JDR IN THE TRIAL COURT AND PETITIONER IN THE HIGH COURT). …PETITIONER (BY SRI.RAMACHANDRA G BHAT AND ASSOCIATES ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1. SRI.R.VIRUPAKSHA, S/O.B.RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
2. DR.SUVI VIRUPAKSHA, D/O R.VIRUPAKSHA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT G-3, SIXCON APARTMENTS, EJIPURA, BENGALURU – 47.
3. R.GUNASHEKAR, S/O LATE B.RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, VIII CROSS, VICTORIA LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560047, (DECREE HOLDERS IN THE TRIAL COURT AND RESPONDENTS THE HIGH COURT). ...RESPONDENTS **** THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.06.2015 PASSED IN EX.NO.2959/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C LXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-23), OVER RULED THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE JUDGMENT-DEBTOR THEREIN TO THE EXECUTION PETITION HOLDING THAT THE SAME ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE UNDER LAW.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Counsel for the petitioner absent. No representation.
2. Earlier, this petition and the I.As. were dismissed for non-prosecution as per order dated 25.08.2016. Thereafter, the said order dated 25.08.2016 was recalled and the matter was posted for admission.
The petition was posted on 05.02.2019 and 19.02.2019 as a last chance. No steps are taken by the counsel for the petitioner.
3. Even today, the counsel for the petitioner has not appeared.
4. Hence, the civil revision petition and the I.As. are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE SJ