IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.47227/2016 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SRI.R.SUBRAMANYA S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT BEHIND SRI. CHANNAKESHAVASWAMY TEMPLE BELUR TOWN & TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
2. SRI.B.R.MALLIKARJUN S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT BEHIND SRI. CHANNAKESHAVASWAMY TEMPLE BELUR TOWN & TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 3. SRI.R.RAJASHEKAR S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING AT BEHIND SRI. CHANNAKESHAVASWAMY TEMPLE BELUR TOWN & TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
4. SRI. B.R.SUBHASH S/O LATE D.R.RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT BEHIND SRI. CHANNAKESHAVASWAMY TEMPLE AND:
BELUR TOWN & TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI NAIK. N.R., ADV.) 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND PRESIDENT DISTRICT TOURISM DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE HASSAN DISTRICT-571201.
2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOURISM DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAKALESHPURA SUB-DIVISION SAKALESHAPURA HASSAN DISTRICT-571201.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001.
5. THE TAHASILDAR BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573201.
6. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI CHANNAKESHAVASWAMY TEMPLE BELUR TOWN & TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT- 573201. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI D.R.ANANDEESHWARA, HCGP. FOR R1 TO R5 R6 IS SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 BY THE TRIAL COURT ON 11.8.2016 IN MISC. PETITION NO.8/2014 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, BELUR VIDE ANNEX-E AND CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE TRIAL COURT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 11.08.2016 on I.A.No.1 in Miscellaneous Petition No.8/2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC at Belur ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said Miscellaneous Petition No.8/2014 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.