IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO R.F.A.No.688/2003 BETWEEN:
1. SRI R PARAMASHIVAIAH S/O SRI K R RUDHRARADHYA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 2 .SRI R GUNASHEKHARA S/O SRI K R RUDHRARADHYA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS APPELLANTS ARE RESIDING AT RAJAPURA VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI A MADHUSUDHANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND:
1 . SRI K R RUDHRARADHYA SON OF RUDRAPPA @ BUDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
2 . GOWRAMMA WIFE OF RUDRAPPA @ BUDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS.
3 . SMT. SHIVAMMA WIFE OF VEERABHADRAIAH AGED ABOUT 97 YEARS.
4 . SRI B SIDDAIAH SON OF RUDRAIAH @ BEEDIMANE RUDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS RESPONDENT No.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDENTS OF RAJAPURA JIGANI HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK.
5 . SMT. GOWRAMMA WIFE OF B SIDDAIAH SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS., 5(a) B .SIDDAIAH ALREADY ON RECORD AS A RESPONDENT No.4 5(b) NAGARATHNA SINCE DEAD HER LRs ALREADY ON RECORD AS RESPONDENT.
5(c) SMT.SUVARNA D/O GOWRAMMA W/O RAJESH KARAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT DOMMASANDRA POST SARJAPURA VIA, ANEKAL TALUK – 562 158.
5(d) SMT. AMBIKA D/O GOWRAMMA W/O RENUKARADHYA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS MANTAPPA VILLAGE, BANNERUGHATTA POST, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK- 562 156.
5(e) SMT.VIJAYAMMA D/O GOWRAMMA W/O CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 5(f) SMT. SHASHIKALA D/O GOWRAMMA W/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESPONDENT No.5e AND 5f R/AT JAKKASANDRA, 1ST MAIN RAOD JANATHA COLONY KORAMANGALA POST, WARD No.66 BANGALORE – 560 034.
5(g) SRI LINGARADHYA S/O GOWRAMMA AND B SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
5(h) CHANDRASHEKAR S/O GOWRAMMA AND B SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESPONDENT No.5g and 5h R/AT RAJAPURA, HENNAGARA POST, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK.
6. SRI T S SHANKARAPPA SON OF TAILOR SIDDANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
7. SRI MANU SON OF SRI T S SHANAKRAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.
8. SRI VINU SON OF SRI T S SHANAKRAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.
RESPONDENTS No.6 TO 8 ARE RESIDENTS OF THIPASANDRA VARTHUR MAIN ROAD GUNJUR POST, SARJAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU – 560 087. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MR.YOGESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 BY MR.VISHWANATH P BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R 6 TO 8 (LRs OF R-4) MS.ANUSHA NANDISH, ADVOCATE FOR LRs OF R5 e to h. V/O DTD. 3.11.14, R-1 IS TREATED AS LRs OF DECEASED R-2 V/O DTD.3.11.2014, R7 AND R8 ARE PERMITTED TO REPRESENT AS LRs OF DECEASED R-3) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.02.2003 PASSED IN O.S.No.237/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DN., BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for respondents present. All the parties to the lis are present and they are identified by their respective counsel.
2. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that the parties have compromised the matter and they have filed a compromise petition dated 3.12.2019 duly signed by the parties and attested by their respective counsel. The same is taken on record.
5. The terms of compromise appears to be lawful and accepted.
6. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition.
Sd/- JUDGE tsn*