Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri R L Jain vs State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|27 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4759 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
SRI.R.L.JAIN S/O LATE VEERULAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SRI MARUTHI ENTERPRISES 10TH CROSS, VASANTHNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 052.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI: T SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY HIGH GROUND POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560001.
(BY SRI: NASRULLA KHAN, HCGP) ... RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO a)QUASH THE ORIGINAL FIR FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE STATION, BANGALORE IN CR.NO.268/2011 ON THE FILE OF VIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE DATED 28.12.2011. b)CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET ONE PREPARED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE DATED 05.01.2012 FURNISHED TO THE COURT OF THE VIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.8946/2012. c)CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ORDER OF THE COGNIZANCE DATED 05.07.2012 PASSED BY THE VIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.8946/2012, SINCE THE SAME HAS BEEN PASSED IN CONTRAVENTION TO SEC. 190 OF CR.P.C.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. Even on previous dates of hearing i.e., on 12.02.2019 and 31.10.2018, learned counsel for the petitioner remained absent, indicating that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
*mn/-
Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri R L Jain vs State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 May, 2019
Judges
  • John Michael Cunha