IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO 2139 OF 2017 BETWEEN SRI. R CHANDRASHEKHARAIAH S/O D. RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O RANGENAHALLI VILLAGE, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.
(OWNER OF THE MARUTHI VAN BEARING REG NO.KA-01-M-9552) ... APPELLANT (By Sri. RANGANATHAPRASAD B S., AND MAMATHA R. PRASAD, ADVOCATES) AND 1. SMT. DHANALAKSHMI W/O JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT RANGENAHALLI, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.
2. R.S. RAGHUKUMAR S/O SHANKARE GOWDA, MAJOR, R/O RANGENAHALLI VILLAGE, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT (DRIVER OF THE MARUTHI VAN BEARING REG NO.KA-01-M-9552) 3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, CHANNAGIRI ROAD, BHADRAVATHI, (INSURER OF THE MARUTHI VAN BEARING REG NO.KA-01-M-9552) POLICY NO. 240402/31/02/02120 VALID UP TO 10-09-2003.
4. SRI CHANDRASHEKAR S/O RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, KSRTC DRIVER BADGE NO. 9318, R/O HOUSE NO. 48/2, JOGAPALYA, HALASUR AREA, BENGALURU – 8.
(DRIVER OF KSRTC BUS BEARING NO.KA-01/F-473), SHIVAMOGGA DEPOT.
5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, SARIGE BHAVAN, DOUBLE ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027.
(OWNER OF THE KSRTC BUS BEARING REG NO.KA-17-F-473, SHIMOGGA) 6. SHIVANNA S/O CHANNAIAH, MAJOR, R/O RABBAR KADU, D.H.HALLI, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, PREVIOUS OWNER OF MARUTHI VAN BEARING REG NO.KA-01/M.9552. ... RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) of MV ACT against the judgment and award dated:08.07.2016 passed in MVC NO.562/2013 on the file of the 2ND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE & MACT, CHIKKAMAGALURU, awarding compensation of Rs.5,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till the date of deposit.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER Finally, four weeks time is granted to comply the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to Bench.
Sd/-
` JUDGE NOTE: Vide Court Order dt. 25.10.2017, Office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: DKS R By: CS COPY C By: SL Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR