Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Purusotham vs Siddaraju And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|13 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH M.F.A.NO.2414/2012 (MV) BETWEEN:
SRI. PURUSOTHAM S/O. BASAVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT RAGI MUDDANAHALLY VILLAGE MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 401. … APPELLANT (BY SRI. P. NATARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SIDDARAJU S/O. SIDDA SETTY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT HORALAVADI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI NANJANAGUD TALUK-571 301 MYSURU DISTRICT-570 005.
2. JYOTHI SWAMY S/O. SHANKARA SETTY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT GOLUR VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-570 001.
3. SRI. SHIVAPPA S/O. JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDENT OF HEMMAVU VILLAGE NANJANAGUDU TALUK-571 301.
MYSURU DISTRICT-570 005. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.M. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 R1 IS SERVED) THIS M.F.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 12.03.2010 PASSED IN MVC.NO.85/2008 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION & JMFC, MACT, NANJANGUD, AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF RS.1,56,460/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT.
THIS M.F.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 13.12.2019 for withdrawal of the appeal stating that the matter has been settled before the Executing Court.
Accordingly, in terms of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn The appellant is permitted to withdraw the amount in deposit.
Sd/- JUDGE ST
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Purusotham vs Siddaraju And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
13 December, 2019
Judges
  • H P Sandesh