Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Poojari Arjunappa And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|15 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos.13354-13357 OF 2015 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN:
1.SRI POOJARI ARJUNAPPA S/O POOJARI KULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/A DHARMARAYASWAMY TEMPLE STREET, ANEKAL TOWN BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562106 2.SRI A RAMESH S/O POOJARI ARJUNAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/A DHARMARAYASWAMY TEMPLE STREET ANEKAL TOWN BANGALORE URBAN DISRICT-562106 3.SRI SHIVAMURTHY S/O P K CHIKKAMUNISHAMY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/A DHARMARAYASWAMY TEMPLE STREET ANEKAL TOWN BANGALORE URBAN DISRICT-562106 4.SRI PARTHASARATHY S/O MADANAGIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/A DHARMARAYASWAMY TEMPLE STREET ANEKAL TOWN BANGALORE URBAN DISRICT-562106. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI VIKAS KRISHNA K. FOR SRI SACHIN B.S., ADV.) AND:
1.STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE-560009 3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION BANGALORE-560007 4.THE TAHASILDAR ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562106 5.VAHNIJULA SEVA SANGHA (R) THIGALARA PET, ANEKAL TOWN BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY SRI CHANDRAPPA S/O RAJAPPA ANEKAL TOWN BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562106. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI R.B. SADASHIVAPPA, ADV. FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.03.2015 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 VIDE ANN-A AND DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.4 TO PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO PERFORM KARAGA UTSAV FROM 22.03.2015 TO 09.04.2015 AS PRAYED IN ANN-E.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the writ petitions have become infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
Writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE sac*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Poojari Arjunappa And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
15 February, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad