IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No.1208 of 2018 (PAR) Between:
SRI PAPIREDDY @ CHIKKAPAPI REDDY SON OF LATE CHINNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, R/AT BALLUR VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. SRINIVASA K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
1. SRI P. NANJAREDDY DECEASED BY HIS LRS., 1(a) SMT. MUNIYAMMA, WIFE OF LATE NANJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS.
1(b). SRI N. PRAKASH SON OF LATE NANJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS.
1(c). SRI N. RAMESH SON OF LATE NANJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.
1(d). SMT SAROJA DAUGHTER OF LATE NANJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.
1(e). SRI N. MANJUNATH SON OF LATE NANJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
1(f). SRI N ANAND KUMAR SON OF LATE NANJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS.
ALL ARE R/AT BALLUR VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.
2. SRI MUNI REDDY SON OF LATE LINGA REDDY @ MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS.
3. SRI MANJUNATHA REDDY SON OF SRI NAGARAJ @ NAGARAJ REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
SL. NO. 2 AND 3 ARE R/AT BALLUR VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.03.2018 PASSED IN RA. NO. 81/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE ANEKAL ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.11.2012 PASSED IN OS. NO. 169/2006 (OLD NO. 554/1997) ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ANEKAL.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 30.10.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr