IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA W.P. NO. 22489/2017(LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
Sri.P.H.Lakshminarayana Acharya, S/o Sri. P.Hanumantha Acharya, Aged about 58 years, Residing at No.253, 6th Main, 7th Cross, MICO Layout, BTM II Stage, Bengaluru – 560 076. … Petitioner (By Sri.M.P.Srikanth, Advocate) AND:
1. The Commissioner, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, N.R.Square, Bengaluru – 560 002.
2. The Assistant Engineer, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, BTM Layout, Bengaluru – 560 002.
3. The Assistant Executive Engineer, OFC Cell, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, Bengaluru – 560 002.
4. M/s. Bharti Airtel Limited, Circle Office, No.55, Divya Shree Towers, Bannerghatta Main Road, Bengaluru – 560 029.
Represented by its authorized representative 5. The General Manager, BESCOM, Ananda Rao Circle, Bengaluru – 560 009.
6. Sri. Gururaja, Aged about 42 years, Residing at No.254, 6th Main, 7th Cross, MICO Layout, BTM II Stage, Bengaluru – 560 076. …Respondents (By Sri. Kempanna, Advocate for R1 to R3) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to consider the representations dated 05.04.2017 vide Annexure – B representation dated 04.04.2017 vide Annexure – C and representation dated 30.03.2017 and 31.03.2017 vide Annexures – D and E, respectively and etc.
This writ petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the court made the following:
ORDER Sri Kempanna, learned counsel is directed to take notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. Sri. Srikanth.M.P, learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo for disposal dated 25.05.2017, which reads as under:
“It is submitted that the petitioner is assured by the respondents’ company that they will not use the premises of the neighbor for installing trans receiver station or for installation of mobile tower but only for broad band switch room and also have handed over a letter dated 17.05.2017 and the said letter is enclosed herewith.
Wherefore in the light of the same also the petition may be disposed of in the ends of justice”.
3. Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of in terms of the memo dated 25.05.2017.
Sd/- Judge Mkm/Ns