THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P. NO. 6349 OF 2014 Date of Judgment: 7.7.2014 Between:
Sri Ommi Dali Naidu …Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P. NO. 6349 OF 2014 ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of Ac.8-44 cents of land in Sy.No. 38/1 to 8 situated at Rushikonda village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal and district. This writ petition is filed on the allegation that the respondents 2 and 3 were interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the aforesaid land. It is stated that on 15.3.2012 the petitioner made a representation to third respondent to conduct survey and fix boundaries and paid necessary fee. Thereafter the petitioner approached this Court by filing WP No.
30714 of 2012 complaining inaction of the said respondent, whereupon this Court disposed of the said writ petition directing the petitioner’s application to be considered and disposed of within four weeks. The petitioner alleges that because of his approaching this Court, the respondents displayed a sign-board on 25.10.2013 on the land showing as if it is a Government land. The petitioner states that he had given two representations dated 26.10.2013 and 27.2.2014 to third respondent to remove the said sign-board, however, no action was taken. Hence the present writ petition is filed.
Learned Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submits that the aforesaid land is in possession of the petitioner and that the revenue authorities have never interfered with the possession of the petitioner nor erected any sign-board over the said land.
In view of the aforesaid specific instructions, therefore, the allegation of the petitioner that the respondents 2 and 3 were interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the aforesaid land and put a sign-board is clearly misplaced. Hence no further orders are necessary to be passed in this writ petition which is accordingly disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Dt. 7.7.2014 KR