IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.53090 OF 2016 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
SRI OMAR FAROOK, S/O A.SHAKOOR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.315, 8TH CROSS, LAKSHMI ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI T.N.VISWANATHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.
4. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK – 560 062.
...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, HCGP (ABSENT)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.4 TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OFF THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 16.09.2009, 03.10.2009 AND 12.11.2009 FILED BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK VIDE ANNEXURES-D, E AND F IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The plea of the petitioner is for consideration of his representations dated 16.09.2009, 03.10.2009 and 12.11.2009 vide Annexures-‘D’, ‘E’ and ‘F’ respectively by Respondent No.4. Since even after long lapse of time it has not been considered, it is just and appropriate to direct the Respondent No.4 to consider the same in accordance with law.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. The Respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 16.09.2009, 03.10.2009 and 12.11.2009 vide Annexures-‘D’, ‘E’ and ‘F’ respectively and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
SD/- JUDGE dh